Why? (anything other than a stubby gas lens)
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:51 pm
I am just a hobbyist welder, retired from a non-welding career, so perhaps my perspective is limited. But the question is... since stubby gas lens configurations are so handy, convenient, precise etc. WHY would you use the more common medium gas lens? I have .040", 1/16", 3/32" stubby gas lens collet bodies for my WP9 torches and 1/16", 3/32" and 1/8" stubby gas lens collet bodies for my WP17 and FlexLoc torches so I am covered for any size tungsten I wish to use.
I recently used the 3/32" in my WP17 to weld a mounting block to the back of an old 3/8" AR500 gong target. I was using 312 filler, 2% Lanthanated tungsten and running 150 - 175 amps. The longest bead was about 4", I did not notice any overheating of the torch or tungsten. It got me wondering if I would have gained anything with the medium gas lens.
I do try to always use a non-gas lens when I am welding something which I can not clean or have not cleaned as well as I would like. I learned the hard way that a gas lens will collect spatter like a magnet
Perhaps Jody would cover this in one of his TIG series videos.
Ken
I recently used the 3/32" in my WP17 to weld a mounting block to the back of an old 3/8" AR500 gong target. I was using 312 filler, 2% Lanthanated tungsten and running 150 - 175 amps. The longest bead was about 4", I did not notice any overheating of the torch or tungsten. It got me wondering if I would have gained anything with the medium gas lens.
I do try to always use a non-gas lens when I am welding something which I can not clean or have not cleaned as well as I would like. I learned the hard way that a gas lens will collect spatter like a magnet
Perhaps Jody would cover this in one of his TIG series videos.
Ken